In an effort to forestall climate change, the US government talks about sequestering CO2 deep in underground shafts and mines. Seems like a wasted effort to me. I've said before that society has to start thinking of CO2 as a useful feedstock input and a valuable resource and not as a waste byproduct.
The next issue of New Scientist (Vol. 191 No. 2572) (story embargoed till Oct 7, 2006) will feature a story on algae-based bioreactors that scrub CO2 from power plant smokestacks to eventually produce biofuels. It's titled FROM SMOKESTACK TO GAS TANK
A win-win on both sides it seems.
From the press release:
"Power plants and transport are responsible for emitting huge quantities of greenhouse gas emissions as both still rely heavily on fossil fuels. Now, a US firm is hoping to marry the two together with an emerging technology that uses a bi-product of one to supply fuel to the other. At the heart of the technology is a cylinder full of algae, which can suck carbon dioxide from a power plant’s exhaust and convert it into biofuel for the gas tank."
Two firms are cited in the story: Greenfuel Technologies from Cambridge Mass. in the US and Aquaflow Bionomic of Marlborough, New Zealand, which specializes in human waste streams.
How it works:
New Scientist reports on the Greenfuel method:
"To produce fuel from CO2, the flue gases are fed into a series of transparent “bioreactors”, which are 2 metres high and filled with green microalgae suspended in nutrient-rich water. The algae use the CO2, along with sunlight and water, to produce sugars by photosynthesis, which are then metabolised into fatty oils and protein. As the algae grow and multiply, portions of the soup are continually withdrawn from each reactor and dried into cakes of concentrated algae. These are repeatedly washed with solvents to extract the oil. The algal oil can then be converted into biodiesel through a routine process called transesterification, in which it is processed using ethanol and a catalyst. Enzymes are then used to convert starches from the remaining biomass into sugars, which are fermented by yeasts to produce ethanol."
ETA:
Proof of Concept , now 2006
GreenFuel could ultimately produce more than 150 million litres of biodiesel and 190 million litres of ethanol a year on a farm between 8 and 16 square kilometres.
Another Spin:
Other research is focused on developing genetically modified (GM) algae that produce hydrogen (H2) in a far more efficient manner then natural algae.
© 2005-2006
Expert, Consultant and Keynote Speaker on Emerging Smart Technologies, Innovation, Strategic Foresight,, Business Development, Lateral Creative Thinking and author of an upcoming book on the Smart Economy "
To arrange for an in house presentation on smart technology see here
To explore the opportunities and threats of any new smart technology in your industry - Contact Me or explore how we can work together
.....Strategy without action is a day-dream; action without strategy is a nightmare"- old Japanese proverb
.......Ours is the age that is proud of machines that think and suspicious of men who try to. - H. Mumford Jones
"Without changing our patterns of thought, we will not be able to solve the problems we created with our current pattern of thought." A. Einstein
P. S. if this is your first visit to my blog, please go to our Welcome page
[url=http://www.spbgu.ru/blog33831#7]free female domination movie[/url]
[url=http://www.spbgu.ru/blog33832#2]amp domination submission[/url]
[url=http://www.spbgu.ru/blog33833#1]free foot fetish[/url]
[url=http://www.spbgu.ru/blog33834#7]my friends hot mom mrs vette[/url]
Posted by: derndecc | June 03, 2007 at 09:47 PM
In order to preserve our beautiful planet we are exploring such plants, technology which can absorb sun energy and convert that sun energy in night period for absorbing CO2 from nature. Please send us your valuable feedback for searching innovative technology for absorbing sun energy in day time and can be utilized in night period for preservation of planet. Thankinf you.
Yours Truly,
Smt Madhubala Sugandhi,
Chairperson, Sanjeevani Mahila Sangh
Posted by: Smt Madhubala Sugandhi | February 18, 2007 at 12:05 PM
To identify the opposition to algal energy, one has only to ask who stands to _lose_ the most from it. Since when is murder "political?" I say: replacement energy, rather than creating the need for replacement limbs.
Posted by: American Biodieselist | November 26, 2006 at 06:03 PM
After reading a recent story in the New York Times on global warming and the lack of investment both governmental and corporate into mitigation and alt fuels, I wrote to the author inquiring why his story didn't include any mention of algae bioreactor scrubbing of CO2 from flue gases.
His response was fascinating. He first claimed that algae could not bring about a significant reduction in CO2 exhaust (which is contradicted by Greenfuel's claim of 40% reductions at their MIT installation), he then said that he didn't want to give his readers the impression that the problem had been solved.
I wonder, wouldn't it be a better thing for a journalist to do to worry that his readers had too little information rather than too much? Greenfuel has installations at MIT, at the Redhawk plant in Arizona and at NRG's coal-fired plant in Dunkirk, NY.
Could anyone imagine a reason that the "paper of record" would not have reported any of this in their pages? It seems to be political to me.
While Greenfuel has raised $18M in venture capital and is setting up demonstration projects within a couple hour's drive of New York City, the "paper of record" runs a story about the lack of investment in the areas of CO2 mitigation and alt fuel, which is exactly what Greenfuel is working on.
And the technology used by Greenshift was developed at Ohio University by David Bayless under funding from the Ohio coal industry. That would seem to be a bit of information the public should see.
Posted by: A3K | November 02, 2006 at 02:01 PM
Steve, so flue gas is not simply 'directed' into these bioreactors? Both the GreenFuels and the Greenshift. I would think that the Greenshift reactor would have a slight advantage in that it collects and distributes light over a relatively large area. I question the commercial viability of these reactors. Not due to flawed concepts but to due to the fact that change in industry is never easy.
Posted by: G. Burton | October 26, 2006 at 09:56 PM
The problems with GreenFuel's bioreactor is scaleup and the energy required to compress the flue gas, so that it can be injected into the reactor. Scale-up will be difficult.
However the principle is sound.
Steve Skill
Photobioreactor developer for 20 years.
Posted by: Steve | October 06, 2006 at 03:54 AM
A similar technology is being developed by GS CleanTech.
C02 Exhaust to Ethanol
GS CleanTech’s Carbon Dioxide Bioreactor
Decreasing Emissions while Reducing Dependence on Foreign Oil
Market:
Greenhouse gas emissions and energy dependence are two of the United States largest concerns. During 2005 alone, the United States released into the atmosphere over 5 billion metric tons of C02, an increase of over 600 million metric tons since 1994. Carbon dioxide is a well known greenhouse gas that absorbs and traps the infrared radiation that is reflected off the earth’s surface causing surface temperatures to increase.
During 2005, the United States imported and consumed more than 200 billion gallons of oil. As our nation strives to become more energy independent and environmentally proactive, it is imperative that we implement new consumption practices that rely less on foreign oil and more on cleaner, greener sources of homegrown energy. We need to be better about conservation and we need to continue to innovate ways to consume natural resources in smarter, more efficient ways. GS CleanTech is committed to delivering innovative new technologies that help our clients achieve this and to help reduce their carbon footprint.
GS CleanTech’s Objectives:
GS CleanTech’s patented C02 Bioreactor reduces greenhouse gas emissions while creating an additional feedstock for renewable fuel production. If applied at ethanol facilities, it would boost fuel production by more than 15%, and if applied to coal fired power generation, it could produce more than 200 million gallons of renewable fuel annually for every 1,000 MW of electricity produced. Even more significant, however, is the relatively small footprint of the bioreactor. While traditional corn derived ethanol produces up to 450 gallons of fuel per acre, GS CleanTech’s C02 Bioreactor can produce more than 200,000 gallons of fuel per acre. With GS CleanTech’s C02 Bioreactor, our clients can reduce their carbon footprint while turning their exhaust carbon dioxide into a valuable source of clean, homegrown fuels.
Features:
GS CleanTech’s C02 Bioreactor is an enclosed structure with the ability to convert a concentrated supply of C02 into oxygen and biomass. The biomass can then be converted into fuel through traditional means.
All plants, including algae, need the following to live and grow: a supply of C02, light, a growth media and water with nutrients. The GS CleanTech C02 Bioreactor provides these resources in a compact, cost-efficient way.
First, concentrated C02 is captured at power plants or other source and piped to the bioreactor. The sunlight is then collected using efficient parabolic mirrors that transfer and filter the light to a series of light pipes. The light pipes channel the light into the bioreactor structure where it is distributed and radiated throughout the structure using light panels. The algae requires as little as 1.5% direct light which means that our collected light can be distributed over a substantial surface area.
Next, a growth media, such as polyester, is inserted between each lighting surface. Water, containing nutrients, continuously cascades down the growth media to facilitate the final required step for optimal growth.
Finally, to harvest the algae, the flow rate of the water over the growth media is increased slightly to gently remove a portion of the algae, allowing a portion of algae to remain and to begin the next growth cycle. The removed algae is then collected and routed for conversion into renewable fuels.
Our technology is also very flexible and can accommodate a variety of algae types. High starch, high oil, or high cellulose algae can be grown in our bioreactor depending on output fuel requirements.
Benefits:
GS CleanTech’s C02 Bioreactor has the ability to reduce our greenhouse gas emissions and to create an entirely new feedstock for cleaner and greener burning fuels. Our bioreactor can substantially reduce the amount of greenhouse gases that are produced from ethanol, power generation other industrial facilities while generating a significant new source of revenue. GS CleanTech’s C02 Bioreactor is profitable for our customer and cleaner for the environment.
Impact on Ethanol Facilities:
About one third of the mass of the corn input into the ethanol production process exits the process at the fermentation stage in the form of carbon dioxide. GS CleanTech’s patented bioreactor technology uses algae to consume these carbon dioxide emissions. The algae use the carbon dioxide in the exhaust, sunlight and water to grow new algae, giving off pure oxygen and water vapor in the process. If properly cultivated, the algae double in mass every 7 to 12 hours and are harvested for conversion into clean fuels as they grow to maturity.
GS CleanTech is currently deploying its first commercial scale pilot bioreactor system and anticipates use of the bioreactor technology at ethanol facilities to further enhance corn to clean fuel conversion efficiencies.
Impact on Coal Gasification
A standard coal gasification facility gasifies and partially oxidizes prepared coal with oxygen and heat into a hydrogen rich synthesis gas, or syngas. The syngas is combusted and converted into electricity in a gas-fired generator. The gasification stage of the process generates carbon dioxide emissions which, in some of the most advanced current practices, is compressed and sequestered underground in saline formations or the like. The carbon capture and sequestration stage of this process increases operating costs by more than 20% as compared to standard coal-fired gasification.
As applied at a coal gasification facility, GS CleanTech's bioreactor consumes exhaust carbon dioxide and has the potential to offset the substantial operating and capital costs associated with conventional oxygen production while producing a valuable biomass co-product that can be used to enhance the plant's power output and/or add new revenues arising from the production and sale of biomass-derived fuels.
Process Demonstration:
http://www.gs-cleantech.com/product_desc.php?mode=3&media=true
Contact info:
http://www.gs-cleantech.com/contact.php
Posted by: Tom Catino | October 04, 2006 at 01:52 PM