Reposted from GregnHunter"s USAWatchdog.com
The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) released the latest unemployment figures last Friday. There was a stunning drop to 9% from 9.4%. How did that happen? Is the economy really getting better or is the government up to its old statistical tricks. According to the mainstream media, the economy is getting better and the so-called recovery is alive and well. Here?s how the Associated Press reported the story, ?The unemployment rate is suddenly sinking at the fastest pace in a half-century, falling to 9 percent from 9.8 percent in just two months ? the most encouraging sign for
the job market since the recession ended. More than half a million people found work in January. A government survey found weak hiring by big companies. But more people appear to be working for themselves or finding jobs at small businesses.? (Click here for the complete AP story.)
?More than half a million people found work in January.? How? The BLS reported there was only a tiny gain of 36,000 workers to the payrolls, and even that number is a statistical lie, according to economist John Williams of Shadowstats.com. In his latest report (last Friday), Williams said, ?Incredibly, despite ongoing regular overstatement of payrolls by the BLS, the BLS appears to have upped, not lowered, the excessive biases in its latest rendition. Without the higher bias, the reported January 2011 payroll gain of 36,000 would have been a decline of 52,000.? As for the big drop in the unemployment number down to 9%, you can credit that with something the BLS calls ?seasonal adjustments.? The government takes into consideration things like cold weather and snow when it puts together unemployment figures. Williams thinks these seasonal adjustments have been distorted by the dismal economy during the past few years. Williams says, ?. . . the extraordinary severity and duration of the economic duress in the United Statesduring the last three to four years has destabilized traditional seasonal-factor adjustments and the related monthly reporting of certain economic series. The unemployment rate rose in January 2011, not seasonally adjusted. The 0.4% decline reported in the headline January unemployment rate appears to be a seasonal-factor
issue.? In other words, seasonal adjustment jobs are created out of thin air and are not really there for people. In reality, unemployment increased slightly. It did not
decrease. While we are on the subject of reality, after one year, the unemployed are no longer counted in government statistics. If unemployment was computed the way BLS did it prior to 1994, the true unemployment rate (according toShadowstats.com) would be 22.2%.
I wonder why the mainstream media feels compelled to only do stories that support
government statistics. There is bona fied analysis that can show government numbers are rigged to make things look better than reality.
Yesterday, millions of Americans celebrated the unofficial holiday called the Super Bowl.
the job market since the recession ended. More than half a million people found work in January. A government survey found weak hiring by big companies. But more people appear to be working for themselves or finding jobs at small businesses.? (Click here for the complete AP story.)
?More than half a million people found work in January.? How? The BLS reported there was only a tiny gain of 36,000 workers to the payrolls, and even that number is a statistical lie, according to economist John Williams of Shadowstats.com. In his latest report (last Friday), Williams said, ?Incredibly, despite ongoing regular overstatement of payrolls by the BLS, the BLS appears to have upped, not lowered, the excessive biases in its latest rendition. Without the higher bias, the reported January 2011 payroll gain of 36,000 would have been a decline of 52,000.? As for the big drop in the unemployment number down to 9%, you can credit that with something the BLS calls ?seasonal adjustments.? The government takes into consideration things like cold weather and snow when it puts together unemployment figures. Williams thinks these seasonal adjustments have been distorted by the dismal economy during the past few years. Williams says, ?. . . the extraordinary severity and duration of the economic duress in the United Statesduring the last three to four years has destabilized traditional seasonal-factor adjustments and the related monthly reporting of certain economic series. The unemployment rate rose in January 2011, not seasonally adjusted. The 0.4% decline reported in the headline January unemployment rate appears to be a seasonal-factor
issue.? In other words, seasonal adjustment jobs are created out of thin air and are not really there for people. In reality, unemployment increased slightly. It did not
decrease. While we are on the subject of reality, after one year, the unemployed are no longer counted in government statistics. If unemployment was computed the way BLS did it prior to 1994, the true unemployment rate (according toShadowstats.com) would be 22.2%.
I wonder why the mainstream media feels compelled to only do stories that support
government statistics. There is bona fied analysis that can show government numbers are rigged to make things look better than reality.
Yesterday, millions of Americans celebrated the unofficial holiday called the Super Bowl.
In closing, I would like to share part of a comment I received recently from a regular
reader named Samantha. She writes, ?We are living in Roman circus-like times! Keep the people entertained and they don?t have to THINK too much and certainly don?t have to notice the corrupt activities of our elected officials. The ?Stupor Bowl? is an intentional dumbing down of our society.? The only thing I can add is the numbers from the government are also dumbed down because things are a lot worse than the government would like the public to know.
reader named Samantha. She writes, ?We are living in Roman circus-like times! Keep the people entertained and they don?t have to THINK too much and certainly don?t have to notice the corrupt activities of our elected officials. The ?Stupor Bowl? is an intentional dumbing down of our society.? The only thing I can add is the numbers from the government are also dumbed down because things are a lot worse than the government would like the public to know.
Walter Derzko
In last year's State of the Union, Obama declared job creation his "No. 1 focus," then spent much of 2010 on other priorities like overhauling healthcare and Wall Street rules.
With the elevated unemployment rate still ranking as Americans' top concern, there is little doubt jobs will again be the centerpiece of Obama's speech.
But more than ever before, Obama is also expected to use the annual address to cast himself as more of a fiscal hawk, possibly a tough sell for a leader presiding over trillion-dollar-plus annual budget deficits.
http://employmentgenius.com/
Posted by: Account Deleted | February 21, 2011 at 11:57 PM